Eastern Partnership – the past and the present

Emil Wojtaluk

The Eastern Partnership (EaP) is an EU’s initiative bringing six Eastern countries closer to the Union. Being a partner country does not necessarily mean they will join the EU, it is more about closer political cooperation and economic integration with the Union. The project is aimed at Armenia, Azerbaijan, Belarus, Georgia, Moldova and Ukraine. The original proposal was created by Poland and Sweden in 2008, particularly its Foreign Ministers at the time – Radosław Sikorski and Carl Bildt. Officially proposed by both countries at General Affairs and External Relations Council, 26 May 2008 in Brussels. The Eastern Partnership was inaugurated by the European Union at Prague summit of 7th May 2009.

Carl Bildt(left) and Radek Sikorski(right) (photo: SERGEI SUPINSKY/AFP)

Carl Bildt(left) and Radek Sikorski(right) (photo: SERGEI SUPINSKY/AFP)

How does it work?

The project itself is established within European Neighbourhood Policy (ENP) but the Eastern Partnership goes much more beyond, making it more flexible and adjusted to the needs of individual partner countries. It takes into account much more factors such the economic ties with Russia and its influence on EaP countries. This policy is much more different, having in mind the history and dependency of partner countries during Soviet Union times, but also nowadays. Some countries still did not reform its administration to be suitable to European needs, that is why the proper EU’s Eastern Policy is important – to show the way for conducting reforms and existing together in some kind of unified system. Even if such a partner country will never join the European Union, it will significantly reform its economy and the whole country legislation to be more visible and competitive on the international arena. Too much post-soviet standards are still in existence in EaP countries. The project is governed within two dimensions: bilateral and multilateral.

Source: eeas.europa.eu

Source: eeas.europa.eu

We can distinguish so-called Flagship initiatives. Projects implemented under flagship initiatives are aimed at supporting Eastern Partnership countries in the process of fulfilling bilateral dimension targets, such as conducting reforms and meeting European norms and standards. There are five initiatives, one of them is “Integrated Border Management” – inter alia about visa facilitation or assistance in demarcation of internationally recognized border, which happened in case of Belarusian-Ukrainian border. The Eastern Partnership is also very institutionalized having Euronest Parliamentary Assembly or Civil Society Forum – which was launched to unite representatives of non-governmental organizations from partner countries and EU member states. In current budget perspective 4,1 billion euro will be provided for development of this project.

EaP Summits

The Eastern Partnership summits shape the guidelines to be met until the next meeting of EaP countries and EU member states. The period between the previous and next summit is more or less 2 years. The first Eastern Partnership Summit was held in Prague on May 7, 2009.

Source: © 2013 Office of the President of the Republic of Lithuania, Photo by R. Dačkus

Source: © 2013 Office of the President of the Republic of Lithuania, Photo by R. Dačkus

As the first it established guidelines for further development of the project, thematic platforms and ended up with specific goals to be achieved in the Joint Declaration of the Prague Eastern Partnership Summit. The second Eastern Partnership Summit was held in Warsaw on 29-30 September, 2011. One important fact was that Belarus boycotted Warsaw summit stating that “the EU discriminate President Lukashenka” because he cannot attend any summit. It is the result of long lasting regime in Belarus, where the elections are forged since many years. If the situation improves, the EU will warmly welcome Belarus as participant in summits and EaP activities. The last and the most “reforming” Eastern Partnership summit was the Vilnius summit of 28-29 November 2013. Azerbaijan has signed a visa facilitation agreement with the EU, the Union has also initialized Association Agreements between Moldova and Georgia (including DCFTAs). The most expected event to happen was signing the agreements with Ukraine. EU was technically ready to sign Association Agreement with Ukraine but President Yanukovych announced he will not sign the agreement and move closer to the Euroasian Economic Union developed by Russia. That is why protests that lead to his overthrowing began. The next Eastern Partnership summit will be held in Riga, Latvia in May 2015, which is seen as the most important summit to be organized in EaP history, especially at the time of Russian activities in Ukraine.

Sikorski on Russia’s attitude

Marshal SIkorski(in the middle) at the Atlantic Council(Photo: twitter.com/AtlanticCouncil)

Marshal Sikorski(in the middle) at the Atlantic Council(Photo: twitter.com/AtlanticCouncil)

Last Friday, on 30th January 2015 one of the creators of this Eastern project was invited to share his views at the Atlantic Council in Washington D.C. – Radosław Sikorski, current Marshal of Polish Sejm (Speaker of the Lower House of Parliament). He participated in the event Europe’s East: Mapping Europe’s Strategic Landscape[1]. In his opinion 10 years ago it was possible to imagine that Russia was on the convergence course by joining our institutions like The Council of Europe, World Trade Organization, NATO-Russia Council. We had some disagreements but the rules seemed to be accepted. Now we are on a different trend – Russia is considering withdrawing from the Council of Europe, OSCE rules have been violated. According to Sikorski we face the prospect of either having to accept Russia’s rules or live in a world of no rules. We have also another problem, how not diplomatic language is being used by Russian diplomacy. In a recent interview Sergey Lavrov has said that “if Ukraine drops neutrality then further partition will follow” – that’s pre-modern way in Sikorski’s opinion. And I must say that I fully agree with it, the language that is being used by Russia is totally unacceptable, not to mention about its actions. Sikorski thinks that USA should be more decided in its actions and show the way for others. Russia sees the Eastern Partnership as very provocative move from the EU. Mr Sikorski has said that

“in current perspective 4,1 bln euro is going to be spent on things like Integrated Border Management(…) or anti-corruption training program and I can’t see how can it be a geopolitical challenge to anybody”.

Ukraine – a strategic Eastern Partnership member

It is not a new information that Ukraine is the most populous and the most important country for the Eastern Partnership. The future of this country means at the same time future of the whole East project. Since the end of 2013 Ukraine is experiencing both economic and political problems.

EaP countries marked in orange (source: wikipedia.org)

EaP countries marked in orange (source: wikipedia.org)

Overthrowing of President Victor Yanukovych was a sign for Russia that they can lose control over the region and that the Ukraine backed by Western countries will not be so much exposed on threats, also economic ones. Russian policy towards “near abroad” can be compared to Soviet times, when it was enough to threat of military intervention or economic blockade. Now, the times has changed but Russian attitude towards the West is still very provocative. The Ukrainian conflict has shown us that it is probably the second Cold War period in history. Even if there are more and more evidences that Russia is supplying the so called “separatists” in military equipment and sending its undercover troops, it is always denied by the President Putin or Foreign Minister of Russia, Sergey Lavrov. The European Union never claimed that the Eastern Partnership Project is targeted against Russian interests, if the partner country does not want to sign the agreements with the Union it is a normal thing. Respecting democracy and sovereignty of EaP countries the EU has never threatened its Eastern partners by any kind of economic restrictions, which Russia does over and over again. The country of Russia is not respecting basic principles of the United Nations such as the “self-determination” principle – it means that each country has the right to decide about its own future. The future of the EaP also depends on the results of the Riga Summit, which for sure will be very important in drafting the new strategy, I would say the “crisis strategy”. I hope the reforms of EaP will be possible to achieve. A very important fact is that the sanctions imposed on Russia are working, but I think they were implemented too late. My opinion is that the lack of strong reaction of the World (including the EU), to Russian invasion in Georgia in 2008 was like an encouragement for President Putin to invade other countries in the future. He felt that no one can oppose to his ideas so he can invade others without any worries.

To conclude, there is no unanimity in the EU as for Russian activities. The situation is changing all the time, and that is why there is no clear answer on what can happen in the future. The EU should speak as one voice, that is the key. Let us also not forget, that the success of the Eastern Partnership depends on the willingness of the partner countries to share European standards and values.

[1] The full video is available here: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=WZRGv-dwpEE


Ukraine – from temporary success to further tensions

Emil Wojtaluk

Maybe you think there have been said enough about Ukrainian situation but I want to look at this problem from another perspective. Since a few months when Ukrainian protests begun we did not think it would develop this way. Recent weeks all world’s media were concentrated on using excessive means of force against the protesters by Ukrainian police at Kiev’s Maidan. I propose you a brief repetition and analysis of Polish contribution to the so called “peace agreement”.

Trigger – the need to integrate with the EU

The crisis has begun in November 2013 when Ukrainian president Victor Yanukovych has rejected the trade deal with the European Union that would put Ukraine on the route of integration. Moreover, Ukrainians had enough of high level of corruption and arrogance of their country’s high authorities. Ukrainian economy needs EU funds and being a part of trade agreement would be the first step to improve its situation. If we look at Polish and Ukrainian economies, there is a significant difference.

 The economy of Poland is now 3 times bigger than Ukrainian. From the moment of Polish political transformation that has started in 1989 this country could derive from Western experiences but Ukraine was left alone under Russian influence area. And Russia is the key player to destabilize the region. Russian foreign policy is aimed at frighten its neighbour and it is time to answer this aggressive policy by reasonable means like strong European statement along with the US President who is like hidden in the shadow without expected reaction. Recent weeks thousands of people have walked on the streets in Ukrainian cities, but the main stage of actions was Kiev. Extremely incomprehensible events took place, police started to shoot to protesters at Maidan with live-ammunition. The final result is about 100 people dead and 200 missing. President Yanukovych was claiming that police forces has nothing to do with that. Take a look at this these horrifying scenes from CNN coverage(viewer discretion advised):


Ukrainian Peace Deal” and the role of Polish Diplomacy

Night from 20th to 21st of February was a decisive turn in the crisis. High Representative of the Union, Catherine Ashton has sent three EU foreign ministers to negotiate with the government and the opposition. Foreign ministers of Poland (Radosław Sikorski), France (Laurent Fabius) and Germany (Frank- Walter Steinmeier) came to Ukraine to report the situation and negotiate. But the most important negotiators were Sikorski and Steinmeier because French FM went to China for some planned meeting. On 21st February they announced that the agreement has been reached. What were the points of the agreement? The first point was about restoring Ukrainian Constitution of 2004 and forming National Unity Government. The second about balancing the powers of the President, the government and the Parliament till September 2014(constitutional reform). Then third point was about the presidential election that have to be conducted no later than December 2014. Another point considered taking care of investigation on acts of violence that took place, monitored by the authorities, the opposition and the Council of Europe. Further parts contained many declarations from both sides like: not to impose the state of emergency by the authorities, both parties should refrain from the use of violence, another amnesty adopted by the government, handing over all illegal weapons in 24 hours. The last point of the agreement was a call from Foreign Ministers o Poland, Germany and France to end all violence and confrontation immediately. The whole text of the agreement has been published on Polish Foreign Ministry website(link below the text). Take a look at CNN Interview with Polish FM after negotiations:

What was the result? Violence has ended indeed, no one was killed after signing the agreement but something more has been done. Ukrainian Parliament has impeached President Viktor Yanukovych and new temporary government lead by Arseniy Yatsenyuk has been created. Yulia Tymoschenko has been released from prison. Ukraine shall have early election this year. The Constitution of 2004 has been restored. The efforts of EU Ministers including Minister Sikorski have paid off but just for a few days…

Russian Threat


On 1 March 2014 the President of Russia requested sending troops to Ukrainian Crimea to “protect the interests of Russia and Russian people living there”. Of course Russian Parliament unanimously approved Putin’s demand to send its troops to Ukraine. Russian presence in Ukraine is illegal, it is a breach of international law and sovereignty of this country. Russian troops are not shooting but started to occupy administrative buildings. Ukrainian government mobilized its troops and called military reservists on Saturday(March 1). Fortunately, at present there is no open confrontation.

But what can the International Community do? Economic sanctions could be imposed by the EU which is also a threat to EU economy. European Union and Russia are economically interdependent and that would cause big problems also to Russia. UN Security Council was ineffective because Russia has the right to veto all resolutions and used that once again. There is also another possibility like Poland’s request to secure its borders by NATO, answering by the same military pressure like President Putin. International Community cannot stay untouched, it is time to show that Russia cannot threat anyone this way again. It is a common tactic when Russia do not have strong enough arguments they go so far as to military intervention. What Ukrainian government should do is to reinstate act respecting of language minorities – Russia invoke the abolishion of this act by Ukrainian Parliament. The World cannot let Ukraine to became the next Georgia where Russia could perform military actions without strong enough reaction of International Political Scene. USA, EU and NATO should act decidedly, I hope without involvement of military actions, though I am afraid words will not be enough. We cannot let Ukraine to be alone!

Read more:

Ukrainian Agreement” of Feb 21, 2014 published on Polish Foreign Ministry website:


Reuters on Polish Diplomacy: